 |
| Faurecia
Audit |
The results of Faurecia Audit
are now divulgated by our Quality Department where
all the strengths and weaknesses for continuous
improvement are mentioned:
Strengths:
- Exchange of all informations has been very open
and trustful
- Process of program management and use of Advanced
Quality Planning
- Realization of internal audits followed by
appropriate action plans
- Training and Qualification of employees is well
organized
- Record retention is very well organized
- Proper identification and traceability is well
organized
- Continuously follow up of financial results and
according actions
- Level of cost management based on the ERP system
is very good
- Management organization throughout all departments
is very good
- Ability to offer alternative innovative solutions
- Design- and development process
- High level of test facilities
- Improvement of following our technical
requirements is obvious (example introduction of
cooling system before 3D approval)
Weaknesses for continuous improvement:
- Health and safety protection could be improved,
especially use of safety glasses
- Exchange of informations regarding technical and
commercial issues should be more formalized (interactive
questionnary);
MDA has become classified has Supplier “A”, which
means that it follows the essential requirements to
be part of Faurecia Suppliers panel. The
classification was defined with the following table:
| Element |
No. of
questions |
Level
1 |
Level
2 |
Level
3 |
Level
4 |
Level
5 |
| 1. Quality |
13 |
|
|
|
9 |
4 |
| 2. Cost |
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
3 |
| 3. Management and Vendor Profile |
11 |
|
|
1 |
2 |
8 |
| 4. Design and Development |
8 |
|
|
1 |
4 |
3 |
| 5. T&F Production and Supply Chain |
11 |
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
| 6. Commitment to Continuous Improvement |
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
| 7. Sub-Supplier Tier Relationship &
Control |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| TOTAL |
50 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
22 |
26 |
|
| |
|
